Tag: conspiracy theory

The Idiots in Washington

When people complain that their government is handling geopolitics or domestic issues wrong, it’s important to note that you most likely do not see the whole strategy. Unless you’ve spent countless hours researching and are connected to high ranking individuals who can feed you confidential intelligence, you’ve only seen some of the moves. It’s like looking at a chessboard that’s 50 moves in but you’ve only seen a few moves here and there, spaced at random (and never the entire board at once). Thus it would be foolish to complain and protest when player X moves his rook. You do not see where it lands or how it’s positioned on the board and you do not see the enemies pieces. There’s a lot of data missing. Then you must also consider that the United States, and other nations, routinely hire hundreds, if not thousands, of brilliant analysts that sit around and consider these strategies. They take into account variables you’ve never considered, they balance gains and losses you cannot see, they interact with covert organizations and individuals, they look at funds both private and public, the list goes on. To complain and say, “those idiots in Washington don’t know what they’re doing! I could do better!” is nothing short of foolish ignorance.

The interesting counterpoint to consider here is that transparency is important. Governments who grow too powerful and can remain hidden from their people are dangerous, but at the same time, they cannot simply reveal their strategies because enemies can use that information against them. So what’s the solution? It’s not obvious nor easy.

Remember, it’s easy to feel like you know the answers, but really hard to actually know them. Challenge yourself.

Parent-Child Nodes and Nuclear Weapons

Not sure how this just popped into my head, but what if the reason we didn’t want countries like Iran and North Korea pursuing nuclear weapons went beyond the obvious destruction those devices could cause. What if the path that nuclear research went down revealed even more destructive powers only witnessed in secret laboratories. After decades of nuclear and associated research, is it not possible they’ve stumbled upon greater threats?

UPDATE 2015-03-14: I want to avoid political issues as much as possible, but one interesting thing this post suggests is that the obvious often masks something more sinister at play. Issues drawn to the front like nuclear proliferation might only be a distraction or the tip of the iceberg. There are probably good questions you can ask that branch away from talking about nuclear weapons and reveal related issues that are more prevalent to what’s actually going on.

UPDATE 2018-09-09: This is about parent topics and child subtopics. We spend our time focused on big picture items like “nuclear proliferation” with a few subtopic nodes to convince others of our “advanced understanding”, but if you could see the whole tree, what percentage of related knowledge do you really have? I would wager it’s not a big number. How can we feel so confident about our knowledge when we know so little?

Copyright © 2024 Nothing Definitive

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑