Author: Sam Shadow (SMSHDW)

Belief, or a lack thereof

I grew up in a Christian household that went to church, prayed, and said grace. I accepted this reality without question and truly believed in God when I was young. He definitely existed and so did the narrative that existed around him. This is important because narrative and structure provide footing for belief to stand on.

Fortunately Church is boring and so is Christianity. Couple that with an inability to answer even basic questions and its flaws eventually became apparent. This didn’t immediately eject me from its control however. At first I resisted and found excuses to maintain the fantasy. This idea was gifted to me by others who emphasized its importance and so destroying it, in a sense, was a betrayal to them, but this force only lasts so long and the roots of dissent were in place. This is important because as the structure crumbles away, the naked belief is eventually revealed for what it truly is. It is only at this time when you can accurately reassess what it is you’ve believed in all along.

None of this is helped by the fact that during our formative years, those around us are heavily influencing our perception of the world. They are intentionally or accidentally planting ideas and beliefs in our mind on a regular basis. Those who have fallen victim to narratives like Christianity are especially dangerous in that they encourage those around them to believe, discourage open discourse, and forbid exploration of unknown or conflicting territory.

However, what disturbs me most about belief is that within its confines the problem isn’t obvious. It wasn’t until I was outside looking in that I found perspective. But even that statement is not entirely accurate. I have not traveled to some new location. I am still the same person with those ideas and memories locked up inside my mind. It would be more accurate to say that those ideas are still there but that they are now connected to a vast network of other ideas which challenge their hypotheses. I did not vanquish belief or Christianity, I proved it wrong inside my mind. All of that information must live there together, it’s up to you to restructure it.

What I gained through this experience is a lesson that has appeared elsewhere in my life. By experiencing mistakes first-hand I better understand what they’re capable of and witness myself slowly transition through stages of realization, rejection, and resolution. This journey provides clarity to the scope of each issue and I’ve found that experiencing the breadth of some spectrum provides the greatest insight in understanding it. More importantly however, I asked myself: what other fallacious ideas have I unwittingly accepted as truth?

This dilemma has bothered me since and has resulted in a lack of belief. A vacancy of opinion regarding important topics. It has required me to reevaluate my principles, destroy sacred beliefs, abandon comfort and familiarity, in exchange for clarity and understanding. I am calmer, smarter, and freer to explore the world. It has also increased my ability to absorb new information because I no longer require excuses to shape observation. I can listen without arguing. I can travel through the medium of belief without attaching myself to it. I do understand that it’s comforting to lean against something that defies death and bestows purpose, but it’s dangerous and naive. The reality of our situation IS a hard pill to swallow, but a necessity for growth into a responsible modern adult.

Why would activation energy exist?

Why do activation costs and the ego exist? How do they factor into the evolutionary development of our mind? Why would we even have activation costs if they make us lazy and less likely to survive? Or are these simply consequences to a self-aware mind?

UPDATE 2013-01-27: Activation energy probably exists for the same reason physical energy exists. It’s finite and wears out with use. Just as we can exercise the body, we can also exercise the mind to make it stronger and work longer. And they have limited energy because only so much energy can be stored in your muscles and mind at a time. You have to rest to recharge.

UPDATE 2015-03-16: I can also imagine that cells, energy in general, wants naturally to be at rest, and that life resists this natural tendency through its own mechanisms. In the beginning cells had minor internal functions that grew in complexity and further from that state of rest. The more complex we become, the more noticeable those forces acting against us are. Life, energy, movement is all working against the natural state of the universe. What it comes down to is managing our brain chemistry and realizing that all these systems respond to change and long-term change equates to more permanent results. Cells don’t want to work, but they will, and the more you work them the more they can shape until they run more optimally under the conditions you’re trying to reach.

UPDATE 2018-09-11: This idea that the natural state is “at rest” might be wrong. The universe is literally vibrating constantly at its smallest levels. To think that the universe is at rest seems wrong from that perspective. However, it may be that we’re “overclocking” our systems which is why activation energy exists. The system wants to be alive and move, but only to a degree. As humans, especially in modern societies, we want to constantly be active and engaged with the world which is beyond the default desire of the system. This is why we get tired and require willpower to overcome it. We’re revving the motor and expecting it to just work or have no consequences over time.

Fear of Success

I’m reading a blog post called “Fear of Success” and it made me realize that maybe a lot of people don’t succeed in life because they actually fear it. Whereas I am obsessed with becoming rich and powerful and enlightened, they are actually scared of achieving because of the added pressure…seriously? That seems absurd, although I suppose without pursuing the right paths, normalcy feels safe and secure. Or maybe it’s their attachment to the status quo. That would make sense since we observe that sort of thing historically and on a daily basis.

UPDATE 2015-03-16: The only thing that really stands out here is the realization that people are different. Truly different. Fundamentally different in how they think. Who I am is alien compared to other people and it means nothing in terms of value. We are all just different and play different roles and have different ideas about what things mean and how they should be done. There are probably people that legitimately self-sabotage because they’re afraid of succeeding. I might be one of them. Why don’t I try harder at work? There’s probably a lot of reasons, but one might be that I’m really scared of standing up in front of everyone and taking a strong lead on something. Standing up at the quarterly meeting and asking a question or giving a presentation. Spearheading a project. In this little world of mine I might be too scared to succeed. We are all very different and yet very vulnerable in the same ways. Keep an open mind and scrutinize yourself from every angle because you might just realize that something that seems so certain to apply or not apply to you, might just do the opposite.

UPDATE 2018-09-12: This is kind of embarrassing to read. I am, and was, scared of succeeding just like everyone else and didn’t realize it. The way we view ourselves internally is so much different from how we really act in the moment. That’s the big difference here. I was caught up in how I thought of myself, but not the reality of real life situations. The fear of success is referring to actual moments in life when difficult situations are presented and most of us fail to perform correctly. We struggle, we break under pressure, we back down, we do the wrong thing. That’s what’s really being said here. I was just a naive kid when I wrote this with a skewed perspective of reality because I thought I was somehow immune or exempt from the pressures of the real world. Really it was just a lack of real life experience that will quickly humble you when you realize you’re not all that you think you are.

Who Am I? (Primer)

One issue that I’m constantly torn over is determining who I am. Very often I see a character from a movie or TV show and think to myself, “I should be more like them. They are strong, have X characteristic that’s [funny/witty/confident/etc.]” and I find myself imitating their behavior for a short time. Examples of this might be, after watching Downton Abbey, I was more proper, after Sherlock more intellectually stimulated, and after Thor more confident and strong. But the problem here is that I cannot be all these people at once and I cannot choose one definitively. I can’t JUST be Sherlock because I also want to be funny, social, and strong like Thor, and proper and witty like the rich folk from Downton Abbey. So what do I do? How do I determine who I am? Often times it seems like the coolest people in the world are those with really defined personalities. Joe Rogan may be the coolest person in the world because he’s consistent in his behavior. You can trust in his responses and predict in his behavior. Who am I? Where do I fit in this? If I cannot possibly choose one path to follow, then am I no one?

I’ve also been told or hinted at that those without strong personalities are weak, insecure, and confused. It seems intuitive even. That most of us are just misinformed and incapable of handling this world because we don’t have strong character. But I don’t feel this way. I lack a core personality that’s consistent across the board, but I don’t feel insecure or weak. In fact I feel stronger than ever and I would consider myself highly informed compared to most people. So who am I? Perhaps I am no one and that’s the point. Maybe when you begin to understand this universe and become enlightened you lose yourself and become unattached. Maybe having character isn’t the strongest level of development. Perhaps it’s just a burden.

2015-03-16: Or perhaps, young Sam, it just takes time. At this point in my life I had only been out of college a half-year, I had just begun to break the seal on the vast world of enlightenment, it seems perfectly reasonable to think that the complete destruction of my core self would result in a long uphill battle towards redefinition. It’s crazy to think how much lies in front of me at this point. I had no idea what I was getting myself into. Complete and utter destruction. I have so many memories of being out in the world, realizing something profound, and rushing home so I could write it down on my computer. Each journal entry slowly tearing me apart and replacing the core of my being with something fundamentally different. Life is so crazy.

2018-09-12: First off, it seems likely that we are simply bad at seeing ourselves from the outside. We have such a vastly complex view of ourselves that we struggle to see the distilled external version that others see. So to think “I am no one” or devoid of a concrete personality is probably wrong. Second, basing it all on a “personality” or archetype is too broad when talking about a complex system. There are a multitude of smaller components that need to be reviewed first. I have a feeling my bigger issue is a lack of self-confidence more than anything.

Read the full version of this post here

Luck doesn’t exist

Luck is not some mysterious force working inside us, but rather tiny subtle flaws or advantages intrinsic to our current personality or understanding of the world. Luck is as relevant as our day-to-day emotions. Fleeting, seemingly random, but controllable with enough data and effort.

The fear of accidentally ruining your mind

Another interesting thought this article reminded me of, is this feeling that my mind isn’t entirely in my control. When I read articles like this that talk about a helpless psychological condition we all face and only few of us defeat, I have this nagging worry that says, “by reading this, you’ll adopt this behavior and ruin your mind!” or something along those lines. I know it’s absurd, but it’s a consistent concern I have when exploring unfamiliar territory. However, I am beginning to feel a force working against it. Perhaps by continuing to explore this world I will eventually reach a point where “I know everything” (not literally) and can completely control my mental states. I could read about something like this article and be entirely unphased by its information because I already know the truth of the situation. This article is actually a good proof-of-concept because I am somewhat aware of what he speaks and have a preformed opinion about it. So as I’m reading I feel that weird adoption anxiety but also something pushing against it, reminding me of my personal reality. It’s interesting. Perhaps it’s belief…which may or may not be good.

UPDATE 2013-07-09: I remember this feeling well and it’s only in recent months that my mind has reached a strong enough point where these worries no longer affect me. In fact, it’s important to note that with consistent practice, thoughts like these have almost entirely vanished from my life. I’ve made a lot of emotional and psychological progress that I wasn’t sure I could do a year ago. It’s very exciting to see such profound changes take place, especially when I had no idea what to expect or where it was going.

UPDATE 2015-03-16: This is really interesting and probably highlights a weakness of mind we call “ignorance.” When you don’t know, anything seems possible. I remember being plagued by this thought on numerous occasions, that what I read or thought about, might infect my mind. Now I am completely free of it. I know too much to be affected that easily. This surely has religious implications, young minds, captured by indoctrination, see a world they do not understand and thus must construct imaginary worlds to explain and protect. If you stop learning, on any level, you have failed. The world will remain a mystery, and you a slave to its every whim.

The human parasite

What if the human race is a parasite? The planet started with a natural equilibrium of water and biomass (plants) with healthy bacteria (animals) living on it, then the human parasite began to spread, devouring its resources and consuming the planet. What if we were seeded for this reason? Perhaps our forefathers, long ago, launched our genetic material into space in all directions, hoping that some small fraction would reach other habitable planets. Spreading the human race through the galaxy like a virus. Maybe we’re destined to die here, but not before launching our own genetic material back into space to keep the cycle going.

UPDATE 2015-02-08: This seems more plausible if life is exceedingly rare. An alien society seeding planets because it won’t happen naturally. Sure they expand themselves to various points throughout the universe, but probably not ALL the planets. Seeding hundreds, thousands, millions of them seems reasonable if the odds of life are so slim by default.

UPDATE 2018-09-10: Humans are not virulent. The planet has never been at a natural equilibrium. There have always been problems and humans are just as natural as other complex systems in the environment. It’s one thing to see similarities, but to reach a conclusion about humans being a virus or bacteria upon the earth is naive. Viruses don’t build cities, write books, make YouTube videos, or perform surgery. Comparing us to them is a vast oversimplification of the situation we find ourselves in. Sure, there are patterns, and comparisons like this can be useful, but it is not a conclusion.

On the outside looking in

Everything is becoming humorous and insignificant. My day to day life is filled with observations of these organisms that have no idea what’s going on around them. I watch their predictable behavior, laugh at their ridiculous habits, and am amused by our social constructs that they obediently follow. I still maintain much of my obedience as well, but see the absurdity in it. I often picture moments when I could do something extremely odd but don’t simply because I’m not sure of the ramifications. It’s not necessarily because of the immediate “embarrassment” I may feel, but rather how it will affect my life down the road…not that eccentric behavior is bad.

2015-03-16: I’ve never been happy with this analysis because I was lying. I would be embarrassed in the moment, I’m not brave enough to let go and do something crazy like that. I was telling the truth about long-term implications though and give my past self an approving nod. I have seen potential perspectives other people might have towards me and it’s almost always negative (there’s probably something to be said about that, but that’s another point entirely), instead these negative perspectives are because I have seemingly disappointed their expectations. I am not the person I think other people want me to be and thus I’ve recognized it on occasion and felt incredibly bad. So in one respect I’m glad I didn’t go the crazy route and let go entirely because that path would have truly alienated me beyond repair. Instead I have been quietly exploring under the table, damaging my perceived reputation in small manageable increments over the course of a few years. But it is ultimately repairable and I can return to perceived normalcy a stronger and more capable person. Oh and regarding the first part about laughing at people’s ridiculous behavior, that still happens quite regularly, but it doesn’t have an undertone of insanity, elitism, and is somewhat less humorous than at first. I suppose after awhile the joke gets old…

Magic and Monsters

The evolution of religion: we started with fantastical stories of magic and monsters because people knew so little about the world. As we learned more the old religions were forced to update. Eventually entirely new renditions were born with names like Christianity and Judaism. In modern times we have the latest revisions which are still being updated and tweaked, but seem to be failing at captivating their audience. To blame? Education is most likely teaching us too much about the world for them to appear real anymore. But religions will persist because people will demand purpose and meaning and instead a new batch of religions will be born and the cycle will continue.

This also raises an interesting question: has this happened before? When established religions begin to die, there must be people too attached that are willing to resort to extreme measures to try and protect them. We should be cautious of this. But ultimately new generations, more open to fresh ideas, will adopt new religions and beliefs, eventually allowing the old religions to die with their last supporters. It also might mean that institutions like Mormonism and Scientology, despite the absurdity of their teachings, may someday be far reaching religions. Although we cannot forget that modern times are different. With our ability to store information and share ideas, religions may have lost much of their power permanently.

Lastly, I wonder if people who have strong religious beliefs can’t actually comprehend what it’s like to not have beliefs? Fundamental concepts are very abstract and belief vs non-belief may actually be impossible for some minds to grasp if they’ve been indoctrinated.

Update 6/28/2013: it seems that most people need some sort of belief in their life, whether that be concretely religious, loosely spiritual, or simply a strong belief in something like business or government. They tend to hone in on some specific thing that defines their existence which makes sense since most people can’t dedicate years of their life actually determining what’s going on around them. Distracting yourself is easier and cheaper.

Religions formed for very obvious reasons and in turn can be easily broken down with minimal research. Man created religion and it evolved as an institution over time, gradually making changes as society progressed. Their mystical claims are clearly false and severely flawed, but what’s interesting is that religions may not function without at least one absurd element (ex. God, Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha, Joseph Smith, aliens, etc). People need a symbol to gather around otherwise you’ve just developed a normal community which will eventually disintegrate without focus on a common enemy or purpose. This answers the question, “why can’t we have the good parts of religion (community, donations, etc.) without the weird religious part?” We do have these, they are governments, businesses, clubs, organizations, communities, etc. Adding an absurd element you can convince people of only serves to make it stronger.

It would also be very saddening if Christianity, or one of the others, turned out to be true because it’s so obviously flawed and weak. There are so many elements to it that are non-intelligent, non-wise, and non-enlightened. It would also be depressing to think that roughly 2000 years ago we basically “figured it out”. If Christianity and God are the end game, then what’s the point of the rest of the universe? How could our more primitive brethren, who knew less about the world than we do, have solved all our great problems? The answer is: they didn’t. Religions merely exist to maintain order, help build society, and give you peace of mind. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing mystical. Another way to think about it is: during the early ages there were many pagan religions because people didn’t know how else to explain things. Whatever fantastic idea popped into their head could explain lightning, volcanoes, and the seasons. As societies formed, governments, businesses, and business-like organizations (we call them religions) formed. It would be foolish to think that smart, pioneering individuals didn’t see the power, wealth, and influence behind these religions and wanted that for themselves. In fact, governments most likely requested these organization because they wanted to unify the people. Trying to run a civilization with competing religions probably didn’t work well, especially if they’re violent and sacrificial. It is reasonable to assume they designed and implemented Christianity and other religions for this reason. You may say, “but people claimed Jesus cured them and performed miracles!” Of course he did because rich and powerful folk paid or ordered people to say those things (if they even needed to go that far). For example, a man who’s always had sight receives payment simply by claiming he used to be blind, and a religion is born through successful marketing. This is a far more realistic and simple explanation for the rise of religions than magic. If Jesus were real and could use special powers than we have to explain an entirely new branch of magic science which is by far a more convoluted answer and thus far less likely.

Lastly, religious belief exists among intelligent and/or wealthy people for 1 of 2 reasons: 1. they were indoctrinated early and either believe it or have always “believed in their belief” of it and aren’t going to change or, 2. they utilize their beliefs as an image to inspire common people to follow or support them, generally for power-related reasons. There is also those who pursue religion entirely out of power or financial reasons, enticing followers to donate or give their allegiance. It is probably rare, and an exception to the rule, for actual intelligent people to actually believe in religions.

The Idiots in Washington

When people complain that their government is handling geopolitics or domestic issues wrong, it’s important to note that you most likely do not see the whole strategy. Unless you’ve spent countless hours researching and are connected to high ranking individuals who can feed you confidential intelligence, you’ve only seen some of the moves. It’s like looking at a chessboard that’s 50 moves in but you’ve only seen a few moves here and there, spaced at random (and never the entire board at once). Thus it would be foolish to complain and protest when player X moves his rook. You do not see where it lands or how it’s positioned on the board and you do not see the enemies pieces. There’s a lot of data missing. Then you must also consider that the United States, and other nations, routinely hire hundreds, if not thousands, of brilliant analysts that sit around and consider these strategies. They take into account variables you’ve never considered, they balance gains and losses you cannot see, they interact with covert organizations and individuals, they look at funds both private and public, the list goes on. To complain and say, “those idiots in Washington don’t know what they’re doing! I could do better!” is nothing short of foolish ignorance.

The interesting counterpoint to consider here is that transparency is important. Governments who grow too powerful and can remain hidden from their people are dangerous, but at the same time, they cannot simply reveal their strategies because enemies can use that information against them. So what’s the solution? It’s not obvious nor easy.

Remember, it’s easy to feel like you know the answers, but really hard to actually know them. Challenge yourself.

Copyright © 2024 Nothing Definitive

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑